|
|||||||
| Amanda documentation | MySQL Backup documentation | Amanda downloads | ZRM downloads | BackupPC downloads | Amanda list archive |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So now we have working zfs send on snapshots i.e. level 0 backups. On my test installation that takes 5 LTO 2 tapes and 18 hours.
Any discussions on how to handle incremental backups on zfs? I have been looking at ways to estimate and have come to the following: Level 0: good approximation by filesystem referenced count, maybe a little bit low but the error is small. It does not warrant doing a dummy snapshot for level 0 estimations only. Level 1+: No way to estimate, only way is running zfs send -i pool/fs@0 pool/fs@1 | wc -c Any thoughts? How accurate must the estimate be? Does amanda do 0 -> 1 -> 2 -> 1 or only 0 -> 1 -> 2 -> 0? I only see the later when running dump. If the later sequence is the only one, it means that only the latest snapshot needs to be kept between backups. Is level 9 sufficient? On some large filesystems with streaming media, I consistently was doing level 5 to 8 backups when they were UFS and used dump. Is the snapshot name fixed in the current code or can it be changed to something like pool/fs@amanda.diskname.level i.e. system/usr/local@amanda._usr_local.0, system/usr/local@amanda._usr_local.1 etc? Unless there is anything that I can test already, I will try and experiment over the weekend and see what I come up with. /glz Last edited by glowkrantz; December 19th, 2008 at 01:43 AM. Reason: Spelling, clerification |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|